Jump to content
Please ensure regular participation (posting/engagement) to maintain your account. ×
The Bangladesh Defence Analyst Forum

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'indian navy'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Bangladesh Military & Defence
    • Bangladesh Strategic & International Affairs
    • Bangladesh Army
    • Bangladesh Air Force
    • Bangladesh Navy
    • Bangladesh Internal Security Forces
    • Bangladesh Defence Industries
  • Civil Affairs
    • Economy & Development Affairs
    • Civil Aviation
    • Maritime & Shipbuilding
    • Social & Current Affairs
  • International Defence & Strategic Affairs
    • South Asian Defence Forum
    • Myanmar Defence Forum
  • DEFSECA Headquarters
    • DEFSECA Membership Centre

Calendars

  • Community Calendar

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


About Me


Country

Found 2 results

  1. MCMV: Previous 12, now 8 KA-31: Previous 10, now 6 More P-8s: Previous 10, now 6 LPD: Previous 4, now scrapped Cadet training ship: to be terminated Indian Navy cutting down on procurement due to Budget cuts The rationalisation process has been initiated after consecutive budgets where projected demands of the Navy have not been met. In the current budget, for example, the Navy was allocated Rs 41,259 crore against the projected amount of Rs 64,307 crore, which officials say is not even adequate to continue annual payments for acquisition contracts already signed. With forced budget cuts hitting hard, the Indian Navy is pulling back on procurement of combat systems, cutting down on the numbers planned to be acquired in some cases and foreclosing other projects that have hit a dead end. The rationalisation process, which is likely to be approved by the defence ministry, has been initiated after consecutive budgets whereprojected demands of the Navy have not been met. In the current budget, for example, the Navy was allocated 41,259 crore against... https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/indian-navy-trims-acquisition-list-due-to-budget-cuts/articleshow/73281243.cms
  2. Indian top court orders equal roles for women in army The Supreme Court also ordered the government to extend permanent service - which has only been applicable to men so far - to all women officers, signalling a move towards gender parity in the traditionally male bastion India's top court ruled on Monday that women could serve as army commanders, dismissing the government's stance that male soldiers were not ready to accept orders from female officers as "disturbing." The Supreme Court also ordered the government to extend permanent service - which has only been applicable to men so far - to all women officers, signalling a move towards gender parity in the traditionally male bastion. With this women will get the same opportunities and benefits as their male colleagues, including ranks, promotions and pensions, and be allowed to serve longer tenures. Currently women are inducted through a short service commission that lets them work for up to 14 years, and only allowed permanent commission in the army's legal and educational wings. "To cast aspersion on their abilities on the ground of gender is an affront not only to their dignity as women but to the dignity of the members of the Indian Army," judges said in their ruling. Last week the government opposed women being appointed to top roles such as colonels and brigadiers, saying most soldiers were men from rural backgrounds who were not "mentally schooled to accept women officers in command." The government also argued that men and women officers were physically different and could not be treated equally. The top court rebuked the government, describing its views as "disturbing" and urged "the need for change in mindsets to bring about true equality in the army." It, however, did not rule on deploying women in combat roles, saying a competent authority needed to decide. India, with one of the largest armies in the world, has long resisted including women in combat roles, citing concerns over women's vulnerability if captured and over their physical and mental ability to cope with frontline deployments. India's air force and navy offer permanent commission to women as well as select combat roles. Most countries employ women in various roles in their armed forces but only a handful, including Australia, Germany, Israel and the United States, allow them to take on combat roles. India began recruiting women to non-medical positions in the armed forces in 1992, yet they make up about 4% of the army's more than one million personnel, according to latest data. Aishwarya Bhati, a lawyer who represented female officers at court, lauded Monday's judgment as one that would remove discrimination and boost women's role in the army. "They (judges) have completely negated all the farcical stands raised by the army to deny women equal opportunities," she told the Thomson Reuters Foundation. "These battles are watershed moments not just for women in the Indian army, but for women across the world." https://www.dhakatribune.com/world/south-asia/2020/02/17/india-s-top-court-orders-equal-roles-for-women-in-army
×
×
  • Create New...